M & A SECURITIES SDN BHD vs TAN SOONG LING

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2011 MarsdenLR 1157

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
M & A SECURITIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TAN SOONG LING – Respondent

Table of Content
1. procedural background and witness arrangements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. court's decision based on evidence and assessments. (Para 11 , 12)
3. final judgment and outcomes announced. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

1. By consent of parties Suit No. D-22NCC-560-2010, D-22NCC-561-2010, D-22NCC-562-2010, D-22NCC-563-2010, D-22NCC-564-2010, D-22NCC-565-2010, D-22NCC-566-2010, D-22NCC-567-2010 and D-22NCC-568-2010 were heard one immediately after another.

2. There was no application made under Order 4 of the Rules of the High 1980 for a consolidation of the cases.

3. Counsel D. Bhaskaran and Denise Tan acted for the Plaintiff in all 9 suits and Counsel D. Paramalingam acted for all the 9 Defendants.

4. At the commencement of the trial in Suit No D-22NCC-560-2010, Counsel for the Plaintiff informed the Court that he would be calling as his first witness Chong Wai Mun, Manager of Bursa Malaysia Depository Sdn Bhd. And that in order to avoid calling Chong Wai Mun repeatedly in all the other suits, his evidence would be referred to and adopted as evidence on behalf of the Plaintiff in the other 8 Suits. Counsel for the Defendant agreed to this arrangement.

5. In this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2011 MarsdenLR 1157

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURM & A SECURITIES SDN BHD – AppellantVersusTAN SOONG LING – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
M & A SECURITIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TAN SOONG LING – Respondent