SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2803

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ONG MOON HUAT & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Satish Nair,R Kathir ,Respondent Advocate: M Indrani

Table of Content
1. two issues regarding the interpretation of 'debtor' and application of the insolvency act. (Para 1)
2. court finds 'debtor' refers to the principal debtor, protecting guarantors. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. discussion on the timing for application for leave under s 5(3)(b) of the act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

[1] Two appeals were argued before us last week. The appeals relate to two specific questions namely:

(a) Whether the word "debtor" in "to recover the debts owed to him by the debtor" in s 5(4) of the Insolvency Act 1967 refers to the guarantor or the principal debtor;

(b) When or at what point should an application for leave under s 5(3)(b) of the Insolvency Act 1967 be made?

Issue (a): Whether The Word "Debtor" In "To Recover The Debts Owed To Him By The Debtor" In Section 5 (4) Of The Insolvency Act 1967 Refers To The Guarantor Or The Principal Debtor

[2] With respect to issue (a) we are satisfied upon a consideration of the judgment of the learned judge as well as the submissions both written and oral of learned counsel for the appellants in both appeals as well as the respondents, that the learned Judge erred in construing the word "debtor" in s 5(4) o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top