Back
FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA
AHLI-AHLI SURUHANJAYA YANG MEMBENTUK SURUHANJAYA SIASATAN MENGENAI RAKAMAN KLIP VIDEO YANG MENGANDUN....
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and context of appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contextual background of the commission and findings. (Para 5) |
| 3. events leading to the commission's establishment (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. arguments presented by parties (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. implications of the commission's findings and judicial applications. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. clarification of judicial review standards. (Para 20) |
| 7. contention that findings are 'decisions' (Para 21 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. arguments concerning the definition of 'decisions' in judicial review. (Para 22) |
| 9. criteria for judicial review under o 53 (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. comparison with similar legal precedents on review. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. judicial review of findings not admissible (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 12. public interest considerations regarding judicial review. (Para 38 , 39 , 41) |
| 13. public interest considerations in judicial review (Para 40 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 14. conclusions and rulings of the judgment (Para 45) |
[1] There are three separate appeals before us filed by the Attorney General. The appeals were against the decisions of the Court of Appeal dated 28 August 2010. The Court of Appeal, which heard th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
