AUGUSTINE PAUL
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
HASHIM BIN HANAFI – Respondent
(1) The charge preferred against the accused in this case is as follows:
Bahawa kamu pada 27 Januari 2001, jam lebih kurang 3.00 pagi di kedai
makan M Rozi Tom Yam, Jalan Bandar Baru Sentul, dalam daerah Sentul,
dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, telah mengedar dadah berbahaya
iaitu 13,767.51g kanabis, oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu
kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 dan boleh
dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama.
(2) On 26 January 2001 at about 11.15pm, Inspector Roslan bin Hussin (‘PW5 ’) led a party of police officers to a restaurant called M Rozi Tom Yam (‘the restaurant’) at Bandar Baru Sentul. There they arrested the accused on suspicion of being involved in drug activities. The restaurant was not searched. After the arrest of the accused, the police party arrested two other male Malays named Mohd Nazary bin Mohd Zaki and Jaafar bin Bebakar. They then returned to the police station. While there, PW5 was informed by Detective Sergeant Zaman that the accused wanted to tell him something. The accused was then brought to PW5 ’s room and questioned. As PW5 said:
Saya ta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.