SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 588

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NADARAJAN SUBRAMANIAM – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Andrew Khoo ,Respondent Advocate: Ram Karpal Singh

Mah Weng Kwai JCA:

Brief Facts

[1] On 25 May 1998 the late Tholan s/o Iyasamy (the insured) signed two proposal forms (Rekod Rayuan pp 207 and 220) to purchase two Classic PA personal accident insurance policies and on 1 June 1998, the insured signed another proposal form (Rekod Rayuan p 232) to purchase a comprehensive PA personal accident insurance policy from the appellant.

[2] The sum insured for accidental death in the three policies issued were RM50,000, RM200,000 and RM30,000 respectively. On 3 June 1999, the sum insured for the first and second policies were increased from RM50,000 to RM100,000 and from RM200,000 to RM300,000 respectively.

[3] In all three proposal forms, the insured had stated his estimated annual income to be RM150,000 and under the column 'Occupation' he had described himself as "a self-employed Managing Proprietor of a business selling and buying oil palm bunches".

[4] The insured passed away on 29 August 1999 at about 8.50am in his house.

[5] The respondent was named as the beneficiary in the third policy only.

[6] On 14 September 2000, the appellant declined the respondent's claim on the three policies on the ground that the cause of death of the deceased wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top