COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
KUALA DIMENSI SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. high court dismissed forfeiture due to insufficient proof of illegal obtaining of property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant's claims were not substantiated leading to the dismissal of recovered property. (Para 4) |
[1] At the High Court, the appellant/Public Prosecutor ("PP") through a Notice of Motion dated 23 November 2010 moved the High Court to forfeit money and property belonging to the 1st till the 9th respondents: the 1st respondent is Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB); the 2nd respondent is Transshipment Megahub Berhad (TMB); the 3rd respondent is Coastal Skyline Sdn Bhd (CSSB); the 4th respondent is Wijaya Baru Aviation Sdn Bhd (WBASB); the 5th respondent is Wijaya Baru Sdn Bhd (WBSB); the 6th respondent is Wijaya Baru Construction Sdn Bhd (WBCSB); the 7th respondent is Dato' Seri Tiong King Sing (Dato' Seri Tiong); the 8th respondent is Law Ka Hieng (Law); and the 9th respondent is Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor (PKNS) respectively.
[2] The Notice of Motion filed by the PP at the High Court was brought pursuant to s 56(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001 (Act 613) ("AMLATFA") on the basis that the said movable and immovable pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.