Wan Suleiman FJ (delivering the judgment of the Court):

This appeal came up for hearing on the 9 August 1978 when it was dismiss with costs.

Seven of the respondents/defendants had successfully applied in the High Court for the particulars contained in the appellant's reply to be struck out, it also being ordered that appellant (plaintiff in the Court below) should also file fresh particulars in compliance with O. 19 r. 22, and on the application of six of them it was also ordered that appellant's allegations in paras. 9 and 10 of the statement of claim as to conspiracy and her claim for damages for conspiracy be struck off. The respondents who were represented by Counsel were also awarded costs.

This is an appeal against the orders so made.

In her amended statement of claim, the appellant, the Research & Publication Manager of a Stock Exchange claimed damages from the Stock Exchange for breach of contract of service, and from the second to eighth defendants who were Directors of the Exchange, and the ninth defendant, its General Manager for damages for conspiracy to defame, and lastly against second to ninth defendants, or each of them or alternatively against the Exch