HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BHD – Appellant
Versus
AZHAR OSMAN & OTHER CASES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of bba contracts and appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the enforcement of full sale price. (Para 4 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. court's observations on bba contract procedures. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. ratio decidendi on quantum determination and bba contract. (Para 17 , 19 , 24 , 27 , 30 , 32) |
| 5. final judgment and order for the plaintiff. (Para 33) |
Introduction
[1] There are two sets of appeal that went before the Court of Appeal relating to Bai Bithaman Ajil ("BBA") contracts in Islamic banking. The first set of appeal involves 11 Writs of Summons and one originating summons. They were heard together and decided by the Court of Appeal on 26 August 2009 and reported in Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd v. Lim Kok Hoe & Anor and Other Appeals, [2009] 6 CLJ 22 . The Court of Appeal held that a BBA contract is valid and enforceable and reversed an earlier decision of the High Court in Arab-Malaysian Finance Bhd v. Taman Ihsan Jaya Sdn Bhd & Ors; Koperasi Seri Kota Bukit Cheraka Bhd (Third Party) And Other Cases; [2008] 5 MLJ 631; [2009] 1 CLJ 419. Subsequent thereto all cases involving BBA contracts that were heard together thereat were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.