SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1586

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NOOR AZMAN ABIDIN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Hussaini Abdul Rashid ,Respondent Advocate: Aslinda Ahad

Table of Content
1. details of the appeals and charges (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of drug possession (Para 3 , 4)
3. summary of the defense case (Para 5)
4. arguments for the appeal (Para 6 , 7)
5. court's reasoning on appeal safety (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
6. assessment of conviction validity (Para 11 , 12)

[1] The appellant's/accused appeal against conviction and sentence for possession, and the prosecution appeal against the decision of the learned trial Judge for reducing the charge of trafficking to one of possession of dangerous drugs at the prosecution stage, came up for hearing on 7 May 2013. We heard both appeals, dismissed the prosecution's appeal, and allowed the accused to appeal. My learned brothers, Mohamed Apandi bin Haji Ali JCA and Linton Albert JCA have read the judgment and approved the same. This is our judgment.

[2] In the instant case, the accused was charged for trafficking under s 39B 1(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (DDA 1952). At the end of the prosecution case, the learned trial Judge reduced the charge of one relating to possession and amended the charge to attract s 39A(2) 1952 and called for the defence. At the end of the defence case, the accused was co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top