Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
DATO SRI MOHD NAJIB TUN HAJI ABDUL RAZAK & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. two appeals filed by the attorney general. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's application for pardon background. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. high court dismissal of judicial review application. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. further evidence and appeals to admission. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court observations regarding evidence existence. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. interlocutory nature of leave applications. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. rules on admissibility of fresh evidence. (Para 47 , 50) |
| 8. determining influence vs. important influence criteria. (Para 72 , 78) |
| 9. decisions on judicial review appeals and remittance. (Para 100 , 102 , 105 , 108) |
[1] There are 2 appeals by the learned Attorney General of Malaysia before us, namely:
(i) Civil Appeal No 01(i)-12-05/2025(W):
- Appeal against the entirety of the majority decision of the Court of Appeal dated 6 January 2025 which allowed the respondent's appeal and set aside the entire decision of the High Court Judge dated 3 July 2024, which dismissed the application for leave for Judicial Review, with no order as to cost; and
(ii) Civil Appeal No 01(i)-13-05/2025(W):
- Appeal against the entirety of the majority decision of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
