SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 4166 ; 2008 MarsdenLR 1

HAMID SULTAN ABU BACKER
DATO TING CHECK SII – Appellant
Versus
DATUK HJ MOHAMAD TUFAIL MAHMUD & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the petitioner's petition pursuant to s. 181 of Companies Act 1965 (CA 1965), inter alia, seeking the following reliefs namely:

(a) a declaration that the petitioner is entitled to be a director of the 9th respondent as long as the petitioner shall hold shares in the 9th respondent. (b) an order that the 1st to 7th and 9th respondents shall reinstate the petitioner as managing director of the 9th respondent at a monthly salary of RM17,000, effective from August 2003. (c) an order that the 1st respondent shall cease forthwith to be the managing director of the 9th respondent. (d) an injunction to restrain the 1st respondent from acting as managing director of the 9th respondent. (e) an order that the board of directors of the 9th respondent shall take all steps necessary to reinstate the petitioner as a compulsory bank signatory to all the 9th respondent's banking accounts so long as he shall be a director of the 9th respondent. (f) an order that the 9th respondent shall forthwith pay to the petitioner all declared dividends due by the 9th respondent to the petitioner. (g) an order that the 9th respondent sha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top