SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 MarsdenLR 76

MOHAMED DZAIDDIN
GANESAN P.AWANTHAN – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the applicant - Gurbakhash Singh; M/s. Gurbakhash & Tan
For the respondent - Phang Ah Hee, DPP

JUDGMENT

Mohamed Dzaiddin J:

This is yet another application by way of Notice of Motion to this Court for stay of execution of the sentence pending hearing of the appeal. The applicant was charged for an offence under s. 4(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961,and at the conclusion of the case, the learned President, Sessions Court, Kuala Lumpur, convicted and sentenced him to three years' imprisonment. The applicant's Counsel then applied under s. 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a stay of execution pending appeal and that bail be granted until the outcome of the hearing of the appeal. The prosecution objected and the learned President accordingly disallowed the application.

I do not know the reason why the learned President has refused this application. The only conceivable reason I could think of was that she has imposed a prison sentence against the applicant. It is well settled that the granting of bail by the lower Court is a matter of discretion of the Magistrate or President concerned. However, it has been stated on numerous occasions that the considerations which should guide the Subordinate Courts in granting or refusing bail pending appeal in cases where a te

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top