SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1994 MarsdenLR 1627

HIGH COURT, KUALA LUMPUR

DATO WAN ADNAN BIN ISMAIL J.

SOON SINGH BIKAR SINGH
versus
PERTUBUHAN KEBAJIKAN ISLAM MALAY- SIA (PERKIM) KEDAH

ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. R2- 24-76-92

Decided On : 02-02-94

Advocates:
For the applicant - Balwant Singh; M/s. Balwant SinghSidhu & Co. For the 1st and 2nd defendants - Mohd. Shakri bin Abd.Razak; M/s. Choe Shakri & Hamzah

JUDGMENT

Wan Adnan bin Ismail J:

This is an application for a declaration that the plaintiff is not a Muslim.

The plaintiff was born on 3 January 1971 at Butterworth to Sikh parents and was brought up as a Sikh. From 1984 he attended the Sekolah Menengah Dato' Sheikh Ahmad, Arau Perlis. On 14 May 1988 he converted to Islam and changed his name to Satman Soon bin Abdullah. The conversion was duly registered at the Mahkamah Syariah Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah under s. 139 of the Administration of Muslim Law 1962 (the Enactment).

On 16 July 1992 he went through a Baptism ceremony to reconvert to Sikhism at the Sikh Temple, Jalan Parlimen, Kuala Lumpur. On 27 July 1992 he executed a Deed Poll to renounce the religion of Islam, to revert to his original Sikh faith and to use his Sikh name of Soon Singh a/l Bikar Singh.

In his affidavit affirmed on 10 August 1993 he said that he converted to Islam without the knowledge of his mother. His father had already died.

As at the date of conversion the plaintiff was under 18 years old. His learned Counsel submitted that the conversion was therefore invalid. The execution of the Deed Poll was only for the removal of doubt.

The learned Counsel for Jabatan Agama Islam Kedah, the second defendant raised as a preliminary issue the question of jurisdiction. He contended that a Civil Court had no jurisdiction to make the declaration prayed for. Only the Syariah Courts had the jurisdic- tion. I agreed with him and dismissed the application.

In Dalip Kaur v. Pegawai Polis Daerah, Balai Polis Daerah, Bukit Mertajam & Anor. [1992] 1 MLJ 1 the plaintiff, the mother of the deceased, sought a declaration that the deceased was not a Muslim. The Supreme Court directed the High Court to refer certain questions of Islamic Law that arose to the Fatwa Committee under s. 37 of the Enactment. The questions referred to and the answers given were as follows:

S: Adakah seseorang yang beragama Islam yang membuat perisytiharan melalui deed poll bahawa dia menolak agama Islam Terkeluar daripada agama Islam? J: Jika seseorang yang beragama Islama yang membuat perisytinharan melalui deed poll bahawa dia menolak agama Islam maka adalah ia terkeluar daripada Islam (murtad).

S: Adakah seseorang yang beragama Islam yang pergi bersembahyang di kuil Sikh mengikut cara sembahyang agama Sikh terkeluar daripada agama Islam? J: Seseorang yang beragama Islam yang pergi bersembahyang di kuil Sikh mengikut cara sembahyang agama Sikh juga terkeluar daripada agama Islam (murtad).

S: Adakah seseorang yang beragama Islam yang menjalani upacara memeluk agama Sikh adalah terkeluar daripada Islam? J: Seseorang yang beragama Islam yang menjalani upacara memeluk agama Sikh adalah terkeluar daripada Islam (murtad). Namun begitu untuk menentukan sama ada seseorang itu terkeluar daripada Islam (murtad) atau tidak hendaklah terlebih dahulu disabitkan oleh mana-mana Mahkamah Syariah dan dihukum ia sebagai terkeluar daripada Islam (murtad), jika tidak ada disabitkan oleh mana-mana Mahkamah Syariah dan dihukum maka seseorang itu tetap di dalam agama Islamnya. (emphasis is mine)

S: Adakah seseorang yang beragama Islam yang memakan daging babi terkeluar daripada agama Islam? J: Seseorang yang beragama Islam yang memakan daging babi tiada terkeluar daripada agama Islam.

S: Adakah seseorang yang bukan beragama Islam yang kemudiannya memeluk agama Islam tetapi tidak berkhatan sehingga dia meninggal dunia, mati sebagai seorang yang bukan beragama Islam, semata-mata kerana dia tidak berkhatan? J: Seseorang yang memeluk agama Islam yang tiada berkhatan sah Islamnya.

Pada pendapat Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Kedah Darulaman yang bersidang pada 27 Oktober 1991 bahawa berhubung Gurdev Singh a/l Guruvak Singh, Kad Pengenalan A 1028701 ia adalah seorang Islam dengan sahnya kerana telah sabit keIslamannya dengan ia mengucap dua kalimah syahadat di hadapan Kadi Daerah Kulim, Negeri Kedah Darulaman bertarikh 1 Jun 1991 seperti yang tercat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top