HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
MAGESPARE MAGESWARY MUTHUKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
ANPALAGAN RAMIAH & ANOR; MOSES MOSES PILLAI R SUSAYAN & ANOR .... – Respondent
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] This claim is basically that of a disgruntled partner in a law firm, the plaintiff, against her former partner, the first defendant. However, since the partnership assets were held by a private limited company, the 2nd defendant, the plaintiff is also seeking reliefs from this defendant. In addition, since the 1st defendant was a director of the 2nd defendant the plaintiff is also making a claim against him in this capacity.
Background
[2] To fully understand the plaintiff's claim, which is poorly presented both in pleadings and in evidence, I shall have to start with the background facts.
[3] The plaintiff is and was at all material time an advocate and solicitor. In October 1992, she ventured out on her own and started a sole proprietorship firm called Ms M. Mages & Associates (the said firm). Before this, she was attached to another law firm where she came to know the 1st defendant, who was a client. At the time when the plaintiff set up the said firm, the 1st defendant, though a businessman was studying law in Australia. Despite not being a qualified lawyer at that time, the 1st defendant, with the full agreement of the plaintiff, financed the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.