SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 MarsdenLR 1794

VISU SINNADURAI
PERIASAMY – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
K Ganesh (K Ganesh & Associates) for the appellants.
Mohd Hanafiah bin Zakaria (Deputy Public Prosecutor) for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: VISU SINNADURAI J

This is an appeal from the decision of the magistrate against the conviction and sentence of the two appellants. The two appellants Periasamy and Gunasegaran together with another (Suppiah) were charged as follows:

Bahawa kamu sama-sama lima orang lagi yang masih bebas pada 10 Januari

1988 jam 4.30 ptg di Kg Loke Yew di dalam Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur,

adalah ahli perhimpunan yang menyalahi undang-undang dan dengan niat

yang sama di dalam perhimpunan tersebut dengan sengaja mencederakan

Kumaroo @ Kumaran a/l Sathu KP: 8028232(B) telah melakukan kesalahan

merusuh dengan senjata bahaya iaitu rotan dan jika digunakan sebagai

senjata untuk menyerang mungkin menyebabkan kematian. Oleh yang

demikian, kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di

bawah s 148 Kanun Keseksaan (FMS Bab 45). (Emphasis added.)

During the course of the trial, the first accused (Suppiah) pleaded guilty and the trial proceeded against the two appellants. Both the appellants were found guilty and were sentenced to one days imprisonment and a fine of RM3,000, in default of which a term of imprisonment for two months. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top