SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 MarsdenLR 280

MATHEW, SIR CHARLES MURRAY-AYNSLEY, PRETHEROE
LIM BENG CHYE – Appellant
Versus
SALLY LEONG – Respondent


Advocates:
TE Conaghan for the 1st and the 2nd respondents.
Lim Huck Aik for the 3rd and the 4th respondents.

JUDGMENTBY: MATHEW, CJ, SIR CHARLES MURRAY-AYNSLEY, CJ (S), PRETHEROE, J

MATHEW, CJ This case concerns the construction of a portion of clause 13 of a Chinese testators will. The relevant part reads:--

" ... if he shall not leave any male issue but shall leave a lawful

widow and female issue his share shall go to such lawful widow and

female issue equally if more than one provided such lawful widow shall

remain the widow of such deceased son or nephew and lead a chaste life."

The learned trial judge held that as there was no gift over, the condition in partial restraint of marriage was in terrorem and void.

The law on this subject is extremely difficult. In In re Whitings Settlement (1905) 1 Ch 96 at 115, Vaughan Williams, L.J., said:--

"This branch of the law is one with which it is not very satisfactory

to deal, and I cannot say that I think the mode in which it has been

dealt with is very easy to weld into one consistent whole. We are told

that the law on this point has been partially imported into our system

of law from the Roman Law, and that this was done through the

Ecclesiastical Courts. And then we are told tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top