SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 MarsdenLR 344

THOMSON, ONG, ISMAIL KHAN
KHOON CHYE HIN – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
David Marshall for the appellant.
Syed Othman bin Ali (Deputy Public Prosecutor) for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: THOMSON CJ

This appellant was convicted for murder in contravention of section 302 of the Penal Code. He appealed against his conviction and on 21st December we set his conviction aside and ordered a re-trial. We said that at a later stage we would state our reasons for quashing the conviction.

It was the case for the prosecution that on the evening of 6th December, 1959, one Tan Hock Choon accompanied by two other men, Tan Twa Tin and Tan Oon Cheok, were going from Kuala Kurau to Kuala Gula. They went part of the way in a motor-car but by reason of a damaged bridge they had to leave their car at a neighbouring house and they then proceeded on foot. After they had gone some distance five people rushed at them, one of whom was the appellant. One of these five men, not appellant, caught hold of Tan Hock Choon and shots were fired. Two days later the dead body of Tan Hock Choon was found about two hundred yards from the road concealed in a drain. There was at least one shot wound and there were a number of incised wounds which could have been caused by an instrument of the nature of a "parang". The cause of death was shock and haemorrhage from the gun-shot wound.

The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top