SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 MarsdenLR 55

COURT OF APPEAL IPOH
LEE LEE CHENG – Appellant
Versus
SEOW PENG KWANG – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Denis Murphy ,Respondent Advocate: WJ Huntsman

JUDGMENT

Thomson CJ:

[1] The appellant in this appeal is the administratrix of the estate of one Gooi Kim Kwan who was killed in a motor accident near Sungei Siput on 21 March 1956. The respondent is the administrator of the estate of one Loke Ta Poh who was killed in the same accident.

[2] Gooi was a passenger in a motor-car which was being driven by Loke when it came into collision with a motor lorry and as a result of the collision both men were killed.

[3] It was alleged by the appellant that the accident was entirely due to the negligence of Loke and she accordingly sued for damages under the provisions of the Civil Law Ordinance, 1956. By reason of s 8 of the Ordinance the proceedings were brought against the administrator of Loke's estate.

[4] Letters of Administration to Loke's estate, although granted to the respondent on 4 November 1956, were not extracted until 8 August 1957, and the appellant's plaint was not filed until 17 February 1958. These proceedings were accordingly taken after the expiration of the period of six months prescribed by s 8(3)(b) of the Civil Law Ordinance which reads as follows:

"No proceedings shall be maintainable in respect of a cause of action in tor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top