SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 MarsdenLR 883

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
AMANAH BUTLER (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
YIKE CHEE WAH – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:N Sivabalah ,Respondent Advocate: B Lobo

JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

[1] The appellant is a company that deals in foreign exchange; Forex for short. It acts for customers who speculate on the value of all sorts of currencies. It buys and sells currencies in the money market with a view to profit. It is just like a stockbroker, except that it deals in currencies instead of shares. It has several departments. Each department or desk as it is known in the trade, deals with a range of currencies. A licence is required to carry on the business. And Bank Negara exercises strict control over such activities.

[2] The respondent was, at all material times, employed as a manager of the appellant. His designation was "manager (forex)". He was in charge of the continental currencies and Ringgit desk. Under the terms of his contract of employment, the respondent received a fixed salary as well as a percentage of the profits annually earned by the appellant.

[3] On 21 February 1991, Bank Negara wrote to the appellant stating that with effect from the financial year 1991, money broking companies were not allowed to share their profits with their employees. There then followed an exchange of correspondence between the appellant and Bank Nega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top