SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 4667 ; 2008 MarsdenLR 1

SURAYA OTHMAN
PP – Appellant
Versus
FOO KIM LAI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suraya Othman J:

[1] The respondent was charged in the Magistrate's Court in Kuala Lumpur under s. 379A for theft of a Proton Putra and alternatively under s. 411 of the Penal Code, for dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. The charges were as follows:

[2] Main Charge

Bahawa kamu pada 2.5.2001 antara jam 0100 pagi hingga 0700 pagi bertempat di tepi jalan hadapan rumah No. 79, Jalan Hujan Gerimis 1, O.U.G. Kuala Lumpur di dalam daerah Brickfields, di dalam Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, telah mencuri sebuah kereta jenis Proton Putra 1.8, warna Kelabu, Nombor Pendaftaran WHC 8162, Chasis No. PLIC99DRRXB005728, Enjin No. 4G93P-GC9801 bernilai RM52,000.00 kepunyaan Tang Chee Fung (P) KP: 721127-06-5072. Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen 379A Kanun Keseksaan.

[3] Alternative Charge

Bahawa kamu pada 7.5.2001 jam lebih kurang 4.00 pagi bertempat di No. 6772, Jalan Bendahara off Jalan Cochrane Kuala Lumpur di dalam daerah Cheras, di dalam Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, didapati dengan curangnya memiliki harta curi sebuah kereta jenis Proton Putra 1.8, warna Kelabu, Nombor Pendafta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top