HIGH COURT MALAYA TAIPING
HANISAL KHADIJAH ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
RAJA AZLINDA RAJA NARI & ORS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] The parties will be referred to as they were at the Sessions Court, ie P, D1, D2 and D3, respectively since the plaintiff and defendants have appealed and cross-appealed against the whole decision of the Sessions Court Judge (SCJ) delivered on 6 January 2023. The SCJ had since retired and unfortunately, she did not prepare a written grounds of judgment of her decision. Therefore, this Court did not have the benefit of assessing the rationale of the SCJ in a proper written grounds of judgment but had only the records of appeal and broad grounds as per the Notes of Evidence on 6 January 2023 (refer to pp 408-425 of the Rekod Rayuan Tambahan 2 (RRT2)).
[2] There were 2 appeals filed separately to the High Court and they were Civil Appeal No AB-12BNCVC-5-01-2023 and AB-12BNCVC-6-01-2023. In short, they will be referred to as Appeal No 5 and Appeal No 6, respectively. Appeal No 5 was filed by D2 and D3 whereas Appeal No 6 was filed by the P. At the end of the trial in the Sessions Court, the SCJ decided as follows:
"1. Tuntutan Plaintif terhadap Defendan Pertama ditolak dengan kos RM10,000.00;
2. Tuntutan Plaintif terhadap Defendan Kedua dan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.