INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
POONMOLI MAHENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
RHB BANK BERHAD – Respondent
AWARD
Reference
[1] This is a reference under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (the Act) by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources, emanates from the dismissal of Poonmoli a/p Mahendran ("the Claimant") by RHB Bank Berhad ("the Bank") on 3 December 2018.
Preamble
[2] This case was partly heard before the then Learned President Yang Arif Puan Reihana binti Abd Razak and the hearing was continued before me as directed by the said Learned President. With this regard, s 23(6) of the Act reads as follow:
"During the absence or inability to act from illness or any other cause by the Chairman, the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong may appoint another person to exercise the powers or perform the functions of the Chairman and, notwithstanding that the Chairman may have resumed the duties of his office, the person so appointed may continue to exercise the powers or perform the functions for the purpose of completing the hearing and determining any trade dispute or matter commenced before him."
[3] Thus, it is clear that s 23(6) of the Act allows another Chairman to continue hearing and determine a part heard case. Reference is also made to the High Court decision in Bax Global (
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.