SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 401

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
HADI BAKHSHI KHEIMEISARI ALIASGHAR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Rajpal Singh,Y Seelan,Tiew Poh Nee ,Respondent Advocate: How May Ling

JUDGMENT

Abu Bakar Jais JCA:

Introduction

[1]

[2] The Appellant was convicted by the HC for a charge under s 39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act") for trafficking methamphetamine, a dangerous drug prescribed under the Act. Consequently, he was sentenced pursuant to s 39B(2A) of the Act for life imprisonment and 15 strokes of whipping.

The Amended Charge

[3] The amended charge against the Appellant reads:

Bahawa kamu pada 3 Disember 2014, jam lebih kurang 3.15 petang, di Kawasan Ketibaan Antarabangsa, Aras 3, MTB KLIA Sepang, di dalam daerah Sepang, dalam Negeri Selangor, telah mengedar dadah seberat 2856.0 gram Methamphetamine dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama.

Prosecution's Case

[4] On 3 December 2014, around 3.15 pm, PW3 a police officer, was on duty at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA). He saw the Appellant pushing two trolleys. On each trolley was a roller bag. Appellant seemed suspicious as he stopped a few times and was looking around while pushing the trolleys. PVWV3 stopped the Appellant and asked for his passport. Appellant had an Iranian passp


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top