SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 718

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
LIM TAI MING & SONS CREDIT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LIM TUCK THIEN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vijaya Segaran,Paul Subramaniam ,Respondent Advocate: Gurbachan Singh

Table of Content
1. claim of shares invalidated on grounds of forgery. (Para 1 , 2)

[1] In the court below, the plaintiff prays for a number of orders against the defendant company vide writ action nO 22-125-94. The action relates essentially to a claim by the plaintiff of his 355,000 shares ("the said shares") in the defendant company which he alleged had been transferred to his father trough the forgery of the share transfer form dated 24 August 1998 (exh D4).

[2] After a full hearing the learned judge made the following orders:

(a) the plaintiff was declared the shareholder of the said shares in the defendant company;

(b) the purported transfer of the said shares in D4 be cancelled;

(c) the plaintiff was allowed to claim all dividends he was entitled to since 24 August 1993;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top