GOPAL SRI RAM, NH CHAN, SITI NORMA YAAKOB
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF HONG KONG – Appellant
Versus
ZAUYAH WAN CHIK – Respondent
GOPAL SRI RAM JCA These appeals, which were heard together, arise in the following way. The learned judge in the court below was in the process of recording evidence that is proposed to be used in criminal proceedings in Hong Kong. He was acting pursuant to an order made under O 66 and O 39 of the Rules of the High Court 1980, upon letters of request issued by the Supreme Court of Hong Kong. In the midst of carrying out that task, he was required to deal with a summons taken out by the first, second and third respondents asking for certain declarations. I will say more about this in a moment.
The first and second respondents are officers of the third respondent bank. They are potential witnesses in the proceedings before the learned judge. They have also expressed their willingness to give evidence before the court in Hong Kong. But they and their employer were concerned about the resultant implications of giving evidence. They genuinely entertain a fear that by doing so they may be prosecuted for offences under the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989, or BAFIA, as that Act is commonly referred to. They are a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.