1982 MarsdenLR 115
SUFFIAN,LEE HUN HOE,ABDUL HAMID
FC KOTA BHARU
YAP AMI - Appellant
Versus
TAN HUI PANG - Respondents
FEDERAL COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO 149 OF 1981
Decided On : 07/17/1982
Ong Chin Beng ( Foo Say Ghee with him) for the appellant.
HS Lim for the respondent.
SUFFIAN LP (read by Abdul Hamid F.J.): Mr Chua Kim Long ("the deceased") died in a wild boar hunting accident in Telaga Papan, Trengganu, and his widow and another as representatives of his estate sued for damages on behalf of the deceaseds dependants under section 7 and on behalf of his estate under section 8 of the Civil Law Ordinance, 1956 ("the Ordinance").
Liability to the extent of 70% was admitted and so the only question for the learned trial Judge was damages. In the event, he awarded $ 2,800 for loss of expectation of life,$ 959 special damages, and costs of $ 1,000; all amounts agreed. He made no award for loss of dependency.
It is against this last that the plaintiffs have appealed to us.
Sections 7 and 8 of the Ordinance provide:
"7. (1) Whenever the death of a person is caused by wrongful act,
neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as
would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the party injured
to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, the
party who would have been liable if death had not ensued shall be
liable to an action for damages, notwithstanding the death of the
person injured, and although the death has been caused under such
circumstances as amount in law to an offence under the Penal Code.
(2) Every such action shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband,
parent, and child, if any, of the person whose death has been so
caused and shall be brought by and in the name of the executor of
the person deceased.
8. (1) Subject to this section, on death of any person all causes of
action subsisting against or vested in him shall survive against,
or, as the case may be, for the benefit of his estate:
Provided that ... (not relevant).
(2) Where a cause of action survives as aforesaid for the benefit of
the estate of a deceased person, the damages recoverable for the
benefit of the estate of that person --
(a) ...
(b) ...
(c) where the death of that person has been caused by the act or
omission which gives rise to the cause of action, shall be
calculated without reference to any loss or gain to his estate
consequent on his death, except that a sum in respect of funeral
expenses may be included.
(5) The rights conferred by this section for the benefit of the
estate of deceased persons shall be in addition to and not in
derogation of any rights conferred on the dependants of deceased
persons by section 7 and so much of this section as relates to
causes of action against the estates of deceased persons shall
apply in relation to causes of action under the said section as
it applies in relation to other causes of action not expressly
excepted from the operation of subsection (1)."
These provisions are in pari materia with the English Fatal Accidents Act 1976 and the English Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1934 ("the 1934 Act").
The provision that is specifically relevant is subsection 8(2) (c) of our Ordinance. The corresponding English provision i.e. section 1(2) (c) of the 1934 Act fell to be considered by the House of Lords in Gammell v Wilson [1982] AC 27.
That provision and subsection (1) of the section read:
"(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, on the death of any
person ... all causes of action ... vested in him shall survive
... for the benefit of his estate ...
(2) Where a cause of action survives as aforesaid for the benefit of
the estate of a deceased person, the damages recoverable for the
benefit of the estate of that person ...
(a) ...