SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1684

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PIRELLI & CSPA – Appellant
Versus
CHIP HWA SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Kuek Pei Yee,Alyshea Low,Laura Anastasia Kurian ,Respondent Advocate: Karin Lim,Nicholas Lim,T C Lim

JUDGMENT

(After Trial)

Azlan Sulaiman JC:

Introduction

[1] Between 1963 and 2018, the Plaintiff successfully registered 24 trademarks (collectively, "the Plaintiff's Marks") in Malaysia in Classes 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24 and 28. Seven of the Plaintiff's Marks are word marks consisting of the word "PIRELLI" ("the Plaintiff's Word Mark"), and other 17 are stylized word marks in which the word "Pirelli" has an elongated letter "P" over the letters "irelli", that looks like this ("the Plaintiff's Stylized Mark"):

[2] In these 17 Marks, the word "PIRELLI" is either in black print against a white-coloured background, or in red print against a yellow-coloured background.

[3] On 11 April 1986, the Defendant's trademark in Trademark Registration No 86001425 in Class 25, for articles of clothing, boots, shoes, slippers and socks was registered ("the Defendant's Mark"). It looks like this:

[4] The Plaintiff's claim against the Defendant here can be summarized as follows:

(i) For a declaration that the Plaintiff's trademarks are well-known marks and the other consequential relief that comes with being a well-known mark;

(ii) For passing off;

(iii) To revoke the Defendant's Mark for non-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top