SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 MarsdenLR 1527

HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
WELTEX KNITWEAR INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LAW KAR TOY & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:A Ramadass ,Respondent Advocate: PG Jayendran

JUDGMENT

Abdul Kadir Sulaiman J:

[1] This dispute between the Applicant and the first Respondent came before the second Respondent, the Industrial Court, following a reference by the Minister of the first Respondent's representation made under s 20 (1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967. The issues in the dispute are in the pleadings filed by the parties with the Industrial Court. There is no dispute as to the fact that the first Respondent joined the service of the Applicant on 1 November 1973 and her last drawn salary was RM1,300.00 per month.

[2] By her statement of case, the first Respondent avers that she worked for the Applicant as a supervisor. In early 1993 the Applicant summarily ordered her to be a "sample sower". The Applicant was not satisfied with her production capacity and required of her to produce more to be commensurate with her salary paid by the company. Later the Applicant forced her into signing a printed letter of resignation to take effect from 5 June 1995 marked as exhibit "C-1". Therefore, she claimed that she was dismissed from her job with the Applicant from that effective date and that this dismissal was without just cause or excuse, and contrary to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top