ABDUL MALIK ISHAK
BUKIT WAHA QUARRY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEGUH PERMATA SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sequence of events leading to the appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
Abdul Malik Ishak J:
Background Facts
A brief chronology of events must be set out in order to understand the case better and these events can conveniently be itemised as follows:
(1) 20 April 1998 - The writ of summons and the statement of claim were filed by the plaintiff and thereafter served on the defendant.
(2) 27 June 1998 - The defendant entered an appearance.
(3) 14 July 1998 - The defendant filed and served the statement of defence and counterclaim dated 13 July 1998.
(4) 30 July 1998 - The plaintiff filed and served the reply and defence to counterclaim dated 27 July 1998. (5) 27 July 1998 - The plaintiff amended the writ of summons and the statement of claim without the leave of the court pursuant to O. 20 r. 1 of the Rules of the High Court 1980 ("RHC") and not O. 1 r. 20 of the RHC as stated in encl. 9.
(6) 11 September 1998 - The amended writ of summons and the amended statement of claim were served on the defendant.
(7) 24 September 1998 - The defendant applied pursuant to O. 20 r. 4 of the RHC to disallow the amendment.
(8) 11 March 1999 - The defendant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.