SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 1088

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
KESATUAN KAKITANGAN PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (KAPENAS) SABAH & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (P.... – Respondent


Table of Content
1. definition of collective agreement and trade dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 10)
2. implied terms from past practices must guide current conduct. (Para 14 , 18 , 20 , 32)
3. management prerogative is not absolute and must be exercised equitably. (Para 23 , 41 , 43)
4. the ruling emphasizes the need for equitable treatment and adherence to established practices. (Para 54)
Gulam Muhiaddeen Abdul Aziz:

[1] The matter before this Honourable Court is by way of a reference under s 26(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 pertaining to trade dispute raised by Kesatuan Kakitangan Petrolium Nasional Berhad (KAPENAS) Semenanjung Malaysia and Kesatuan Kakitangan Petrolium Nasional Berhad (KAPENAS) Sabah (hereinafter referred to as "the Union") in relation to the differences adopted by Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) (hereinafter referred to as the Company) in the awarding of the quantum of annual increments and performance bonuses for the year 2014, for its non-executive employees who fall under the scope of the Collective Agreement between parties for the period from 1 January 2013 until 31 December 2015 ("2013 - 2015 CA"). The Industrial Court has given cognizance to the Colle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top