SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 1688

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FITENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BALLAST NEDAM GROEP NV (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts of the contract and parties' actions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
Balia Yusof Wahi J:

The hearing before me is by way of submissions as agreed by the parties in accordance with O 33 r 2 of the Rules of the High based on the agreed facts and issues as listed in Lampiran 21. The agreed facts are as follows:

1. On 19 October 1999 the Defendant was awarded a contract known as The Construction, Completion and Maintenance of Package 1B - Pembinaan Jambatan Sungai Prai, Jalan Tuju dan Lain-lain Kerja yang Berkaitan.

2. Prior to this award, the Plaintiff had assisted the Defendant in tendering for the Project as detailed in Question and Answer 4 in the Witness Statement of Tai Chong Keng.

3. On 9 March 2000, a Letter of Intent was issued by the Defendant and accepted by the Plaintiff for the construction of Pile Caps, Piers and Portals for RM16,713,752.00. This figure was subsequently increased to RM18,530,010.40. This award did not include any piling work.

4. Sometime in the 2nd half of 2000, the Plaintiff commenced work on the Pile Caps, Piers and Portals.

5. By a letter dated 17 August 2001, the Superintending Officer's Representative instructed the Defendant to remov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top