SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 1631

COURT OF APPEAL , PUTRAJAYA
OUSENG SAMA-AE – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conviction history and case background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. prima facie case of trafficking established (Para 6 , 7 , 9)
3. defendant's attempts to refute possession (Para 8 , 12 , 15)
4. burden of rebutting statutory presumption (Para 10 , 11 , 13)
5. court's agreement with trial judge's finding (Para 18)
Hishamudin Mohd Yunus JCA:

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned judge of the High Court of Kota Bharu who, on 16 June 2008, had convicted the appellant (the accused) of the charge of trafficking in 1996.7 grams of cannabis, a capital offence under s. 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ('the DDA') , and had sentenced him to death under s. 39B(2) of the .

[2] The appellant, Mr Ouseng Sama-Ae, is a Thai national. The charge against him states:

Bahawa kamu pada 10/1/2002 jam lebih kurang 3.20 petang berada di beranda rumah (GDMA 8/1) Kg. Berek, Gong Dermin, Banggu, 16150 Kota Bharu di dalam Jajahan Kota Bharu, di dalam Negeri Kelantan didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya jenis "Cannabis" berat bersih 1996.7 gram, dengan itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah seksyen 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 (Semakan Akta 1980) dan bole

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top