LEGASRI PURANA CHANDRAN vs SREEPATHY GANAPATHY KRISHAN IYER

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2010 MarsdenLR 67

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEGASRI PURANA CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
SREEPATHY GANAPATHY KRISHAN IYER – Respondent

Table of Content
1. court's interim orders related to child custody. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. contempt of court affects ability to be heard. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. legal precedents support contempt implications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. decision on custodial rights based on welfare of child. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
5. material changes justify variations in custody. (Para 30 , 31)

Yeoh Wee Siam JC:

[1] This is an appeal by Legasri a/p Purana Chandran @ Maniam, the petitioner wife ("the wife") against my decision made in chambers on 3 March 2010 in respect of encl. 49.

[2] Enclosure 49 is an application by the applicant ie, Sreepathy a/l Ganapathy Krishna Iyer, the petitioner husband ("the husband"), for the following orders:

1. Variation of the decree nisi dated 13 November 2006 that:

(a) the petitioner husband, Sreepathy a/l Ganapathy Krishna Iyer (No. K/P: 680513-10-7113) shall be granted sole guardianship, custody, care and control of the child of the marriage namely, Adrika Sreepathy Iyer (Birth Certificate No: BE 63020) ("the child");

(b) the petitioner husband shall retain the international passport of the child.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2010 MarsdenLR 67

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURLEGASRI PURANA CHANDRAN – AppellantVersusSREEPATHY GANAPATHY KRISHAN IYER – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEGASRI PURANA CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
SREEPATHY GANAPATHY KRISHAN IYER – Respondent