SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 MarsdenLR 409

AJAIB SINGH
SUBRAMANIAM – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the first appellant - Datuk Balwant Singh For the second appellant - K. Gunaretnam For the respondent - Abu Hashim bin Haji Abu Bakar (DPP)

JUDGMENT

Ajaib Singh J:

This was an appeal against sentence. The appellants were charged on two counts under ss. 392 and 397 read with s. 34 of the Penal Code and upon their pleading guilty to the charges they were each sentenced to four years' imprisonment. In addition the first appellant was ordered to receive two strokes of the rotan and the second appellant was ordered to receive one stroke of the rotan.

The facts of this case as recorded by the learned President of the Sessions Court were that on 26 August 1974 at about 2 a.m. the two appellants together with a third person went to Labu Estate. One of them proceeded to the house of the complainant who was a hospital assistant of the estate dispensary. This person called out the complainant and told him that he had brought an injured man to the dispensary and requested the complainant to give him medical treatment. The complainant dressed up and accompanied the person to the dispensary which was a short distance away from the complainant's house. There the complainant saw two persons seated on a bench near the dispensary. The complainant then opened the dispensary and switched on the lights whereupon the three persons followed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top