HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PP – Appellant
Versus
VASANTA AMARASEKERA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged with forgery of a will. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background surrounding the will. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. magistrate's reliance on handwriting expert evidence. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. accused's contentions against the conviction. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. elements of forgery under penal code. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. importance of intent in forgery charges. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. court's analysis of evidence and testimonies. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 8. evaluation of handwriting experts' credibility. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 9. importance of direct evidence in forgery cases. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78) |
| 10. conclusion and acquittal of the accused. (Para 79) |
[1] Vasanta a/l Amarasekera, ("the accused") was charged with an offence of forgery of a Will under s 467 of the Penal Code before the Magistrate Court. He was found guilty of the charge and was convicted and sentenced to a one (1) year and six (6) months imprisonment from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.