SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5290

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHOO KAH SING, JCA
ONG KWEE LEE – Appellant
Versus
ABLE PERFECT SDN BHD – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: B-02(NCvC)(W)-2083-11-2022]



Petitioner Advocates:Cyrus Das,Lau Kee Sern,Leong Xin Wen ,Respondent Advocate: Harjinder Singh Saudagar Singh,Leong Yeng Kong,Chia Zong You

A private express trust was established, granting immediate beneficial ownership of shares to the appellant, with dividends held in trust for his benefit.

Headnote:(A) Trusts - Private Express Trust - Certainty of Intention, Subject Matter, and Object - The court found that a private express trust was created by the Trust Deed dated 11 April 2016, which clearly outlined the parties' intentions and obligations regarding the shares. (Paras 12-15, 40-41)

(B) Beneficial Ownership - The court ruled that beneficial ownership of the shares was immediate upon execution of the Trust Deed, not contingent upon full payment of acquisition costs. (Paras 19-20, 40)

(C) Dividends - The court held that dividends declared from the shares were also held in trust for the appellant's benefit, and could be used to offset acquisition costs. (Paras 25-26, 42)

(D) Demand for Repayment - The respondent was entitled to demand repayment of acquisition costs as per the Trust Deed, but the appellant could use dividends to offset these costs. (Paras 31-34) (E) Final Decision - The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent RM3,563,521.68 with interest. (Paras 44-45)

JUDGMENT

Choo Kah Sing JCA:

Introduction

[1] The bone of contention in this appeal is whether the appellant was a beneficiary of 250,000 shares of a company known as Sekoplas Industries Sdn Bhd (hereafter "the said shares"), and whether the appellant was in breach of a Trust Deed dated 11 April 2016 (hereafter "the Trust Deed") in regard to the mode of payment towards the acquisition of the said shares which were registered in the name of the respondent, and whether the appellant was entitled to enjoy the benefit of the dividends to the said shares immediately despite not having paid the full amount of his portion of the shared acquisition costs to the respondent.

[2] The respondent contended that it was entitled under the Trust Deed to demand from the appellant the shared acquisition costs for the said shares together with interest, whereas the appellant, in his counterclaim, contended that his payment for the shared acquisition costs was by way of offsetting his entitlement to the dividends declared from the said shares, and that the dividends received would be used to offset the amount owing to the respondent for the acquisition of the said shares. In essence, the appellant's counterclaim sought immediate benefit and entitlement of the dividends accrued from time to time despite the appellant not having paid in full his part of the shared acquisition costs (including the purchase price) of the said shares.

[3] The High Court found in favour of the respondent, and did not accept that the parties had created a trust for the said shares in that the respondent was holding on trust the said shares for the benefit of the appellant. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appellant's counterclaim. Dissatisfied with the decision of the High Court , the appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Brief Facts

[4] The appellant, Ong Kwee Lee, and one Ng Keng Hoe were friends and business partners. In early 2016, they agreed to jointly acquire 500,000 shares of the company, Sekoplas Industries Sdn Bhd, and each would be entitled to 250,000 shares. The purchase price for the 500,000 shares was RM18,750,000.00. The appellant could not come up with his portion (50%) of the purchase price of the 500,000 shares. They then decided to use the respondent company as the vehicle to acquire all the 500,000 shares.

[5] The appellant contributed cash of RM500,000.00, and the respondent contributed the entire balance purchase price, including other costs incidental to the acquisition of the 500,000 shares. The respondent took out a term loan to finance the purchase of the 500,000 shares from a local bank. The appellant and the respondent (through Ng Keng Hoe) agreed that the 500,000 shares would be used as security (by way of a charge) for the term loan.

[6] In addition to the shares being the security for the loan, the respondent also provided a 3rd party charge of a property which belonged to Ng Keng Hoe's wife and further provided a personal Joint and Several Guarantee executed by Ng Keng Hoe and the wife in favour of the local bank. The loan was a term loan over a repayment period of seven years by way of monthly instalments. The acquisition of the 500,000 shares was completed on 11 April 2016. On the same day, 11 April 2016, the appellant and respondent entered into the Trust Deed. The salient terms of the Trust Deed read as follows:

"Whereas:

A. The Trustee [the respondent] is presently the registered owner of 500,000 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each, representing 50% of the issued and paid- up share capital ("Total Shares") of SEKOPLAS INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (Company No 92720-W), a private limited company incorporated in Malaysia and having its registered address at Suit 1603, 16th Floor, Wisma Lim Foo Yong, No 86, Jalan Raja Chulan, 50200 Kuala Lumpur ("Company").

B. The Total Shares were acquired at a price of RM18,750,000.00 via the Share Acquisition Agreement dated 28 January 2016, and partly financed by a loan granted to the Trustee by Hong Leong

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top