SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 57

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MAJLIS PEGUAM – Appellant
Versus
CHNG ENG HING FRANK – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ong Eng Hong ,Respondent Advocate: Verghese Aaron Mathews,Khor Chai Hoong

JUDGMENT

Collin Lawrence Sequerah JCA:

(A) Introduction

[1] This is the appellant/intervener's appeal against the decision of the learned High Court Judge ("HCJ") on 27 March 2023 in allowing the appeal against the appellant's order dated 26 February 2023.

[2] This appeal relates to the power of the appellant (Disciplinary Board) ("DB") in directing its Disciplinary Committee ("DC") to make a finding on the respondent's liability vide a letter dated 19 April 2019 pursuant to r 28 of the Legal Profession (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2017, ("2017 Rules").

(B) Background Facts

[3] The pertinent facts that led to this appeal emanate from the appointment of the respondent who is a practicing lawyer and was appointed by the Complainant, Tok Tiak Hoong ("the Complainant") to handle a legal matter against CIMB on her behalf.

[4] There is no dispute that the Complainant paid the sum of RM50,000.00 to the respondent.

[5] There exists a dispute as to whether the said sum was paid by way of a retainer for the specific purpose of initiating legal action against CIMB or whether it was also in relation to other matters involving legal matters relating to the Complainant, her son and her former compan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top