HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LA KAFFA INTERNATIONAL CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
LOOB HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute concerning arbitration and interim injunction applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
[2] Pending the disposal of Singapore Arbitral Proceedings, La Kaffa and Loob filed applications for interim injunctions under s 11(1) of Arbitration Act 2005 ( AA ). Both applications are heard together and raise the following issues:
(1) whether Loob, its directors (including their spouses and immediate family members) and employees should be restrained from, amongst others, carrying on business which is identical or similar to Chatime Franchise business. This question concerns an interpretation of s 27(1) of the Franchise Act 1998 ( FA );
(2) whether Loob, its directors and employees should be enjoined from interfering with La Kaffa's rights and obligations as "Master Franchisee" to render operations consultancy to Chatime "Franchised Stores" (Chatime Franchisees) under art 17(IV) of the "Regional Exclusive R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.