SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 1263

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MAJU-TH SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA TABUNG HAJI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Saheran Suhendran JC:

Introduction

[1] This application raises an important issue for which, as advised by Counsel, there is no reported decision in Malaysia. The issue is whether shareholders have a sufficient interest in a judicial management application ("JMA") so as to give them a right to be heard thereon and thus, a right to intervene.

[2] On the application of the Proposed Intervener to intervene in the JMA ("the Intervener NoA"), I granted the application. These are my reasons.

[3] The issue must be seen in the context of the interests of shareholders and creditors in a company in or verging on insolvency. This is necessary as s 404(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2016 ("the Act") provides that a JMAmay only be made to Court on the pre-conditions that, inter alia, the company or a creditor considers that the company is or will be unable to pay its debts and there is a reasonable probability of rehabilitation or that the interests of the creditors would be better served than resorting to a winding up.

[4] Insolvency and rehabilitation are therefore the key drivers of a JMA and shareholder rights should be examined in this context. It may also be useful to examine such

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top