SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 1538

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TETUAN THESELIM MOHD SAHAL & CO & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TAN BOON HUAT & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court found negligence due to insufficient care from solicitors. (Para 1 , 3 , 12)
2. this is an appeal against the high court's decision. (Para 2)
3. facts regarding the plaintiffs' property transaction and subsequent claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. plaintiffs allege negligence by solicitors led to financial damages. (Para 11 , 13)
5. actions of the plaintiffs after knowledge of issues affected their claims. (Para 14 , 15 , 17)
6. high court found defendants negligent; appeal evaluates causation. (Para 16 , 18)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court at Kuala Lumpur delivered on 10 July 2015 after a full trial. The written grounds of judgment of the learned judge is dated 12 April 2016. The High Court had allowed the respondent's claims for professional negligence. The defendants were found jointly and severally liable for negligence and the plaintiffs were awarded special damages of RM190,000.00 and general damages of RM2 million together with interest and costs fixed at RM30,000.00.

[2] This appeal was heard on 15 August 2016. After hearing the parties and taking into consideration the written submissions, we allowed the appeal and s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top