SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 MarsdenLR 913

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
HU SEPANG – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR KEONG ON ENG & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:C G Oh ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Yusoff

JUDGMENT

Lim Beng Choon J:

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar of this Court (SAR) given on 9 February 1990 dismissing the defendants' application made by way of summons-in-chambers pursuant to O 18 r 19 of the Rules of the High 1980 to strike out the writ action instituted by the plaintiff and to stay all proceedings in the action pending the disposal of defendants' application. It is important to note that although in their application to strike out the writ action the defendants had asserted therein that they would rely on all the four grounds specified in the said O 18 r 19(1) nevertheless in his submission at the hearing before the SAR on 18 October 1989, the Senior Federal Counsel representing the three defendants submitted that he would rely only on the ground that the writ and statement of claim of the plaintiff had not revealed any cause of action; hence the defendants had not filed any affidavit in support of their application as they were precluded from doing so under subrule (2) of O 18 r 19.

1

[2] The law relating to the summary process of striking out an action on the ground that the statement of claim does not show a cause of act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top