SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 2224

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SAMUNDEE DEVAN KERISHNAN MUTHU – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Karpal Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Nurulhuda Nur'aini Mohd Noor

JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak JCA:

The Charges

[1] The appellant ("the accused") faced two drug charges in the High Court of Shah Alam under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Act 234) ("the Act") and those two drug charges are as follows:

First Charge

For trafficking in dangerous drugs under s 39B(1)(a) of the Act, to wit, 33.2 grammes of heroin and monoacetylmorphines (5.8 grammes of heroin and 27.4 grammes of monoacetylmorphines) on 2 April 1999 at about 10.15am at the car park of Flat "C", Taman Petaling Utama, Jalan Klang Lama, in the district of Petaling Jaya, in the State of Selangor Darul Ehsan ("car park of Flat 'C'") and punishable under s 39B(2) of the Act.

Second Charge

For trafficking in dangerous drugs under s 39B(1)(a) of the Act, to wit, 514.1 grammes of heroin and monoacetylmorphines (73.6 grammes of heroin and 440.5 grammes of monoacetylmorphines) on 2 April 1999 at about 10.15am at the car park of Flat "C", Taman Petaling Utama, Jalan Klang Lama, in the district of Petaling Jaya, in the State of Selangor Darul Ehsan ("car park of Flat 'C'") and punishable under s 39B(2) of the Act.

The Outcome Of The Trial At The High Court

[2] At the close of the case for the prosecution, the Hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top