SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 387

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TAN YEW CHOY – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Hisham Teh Poh Teik ,Respondent Advocate: Awg Armadajaya Awg Mahmud

JUDGMENT

Zulkefli Makinudin J:

Introduction

[1] The appellant was charged in the High Court at Kuala Lumpur on the following two charges under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act") :

First Charge

Bahawa kamu, pada 10 Januari 2001, jam lebih kurang 1.00 tengahari, di rumah nombor 3-1-15, Green View Apartment, Jalan 8/40, Taman Pusat Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, telah mengedar dadah berbahaya, iaitu 224.65 gram cannabis, oleh itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama.

Second Charge

Bahawa kamu, pada 10 Januari 2001, jam lebih kurang 1.00 tengahari, di rumah nombor 3-1-15, Green View Apartment, Jalan 8/40, Taman Pusat Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, telah memiliki dadah berbahaya iaitu 20.73 gram methamphetamine, oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 12(2) Akta Dadah Berbahaya dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 39A(1) Akta yang sama.

[2] The appellant was found guilty by the High Court in respect of both the charges. He was sentenced to death on the charge of trafficking of cannabis under the first charge and was sentenced to three years imprisonmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top