JUDGMENT

Aliza Sulaiman J:

Introduction

[1] Since the filing of the suit by the plaintiffs against the defendants on 24 February 2020 to the time of writing of these grounds of judgment, 14 interlocutory applications have been filed by the parties, to be exact, nine by the plaintiffs and five by the defendants. Needless to say, this case is a classic example of a long, bitter and intense dispute by one group of parties on one hand against the proposed development of land by another group of parties located in close proximity to the former's properties.

[2] These grounds of judgment set out the full reasons of this Court in relation to the following applications:

(a) the 1st defendant's ('D1') and the 2nd defendant's ('D2') application in encl 65 dated 8 May 2020 ('EOT Application') for an extension of time ('EOT') to carry out and complete the works as stated in para (B) of the Ad Interim Injunction Order dated 28 February 2020. The EOT Application was heard on 25 June 2020, 19 March 2021 and 28 May 2021 and it was dismissed by the Court on 31 May 2021 with costs of RM10,000.00 to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs, subject to allocatur;

(b) the plaintiffs' application in encl 4