SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 522

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
WONG SHEE KAI – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Nahendran Navaratnam,Wong Wye Wah,Ivanpal Singh Grewal ,Respondent Advocate: Suzana Atan,Kogilambigai

JUDGMENT

Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ:

Introduction

[1] This is a petition filed in the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Federal Court pursuant to leave granted by a Judge of this Court under art 4(3) and (4) of the Federal Constitution (' FC '). The petition essentially sought to challenge the constitutional validity of ss 63 and 64 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 ('AMLATPUAA 2001').

[2] The reliefs sought vide para 18 of the petition are as follows:

"18.1. A declaration that s 63 of Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 is invalid and/ or void because it is inconsistent with and contrary to art 5 and/ or art 8 of the Federal Constitution ;

18.2. A declaration that s 64 of Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 is invalid and/ or void because it is inconsistent with and contrary to art 5 and/ or art 8 of the Federal Constitution ;

18.3. Such further and/ or other reliefs deemed fit and just by this Honourable Court.".

[3] Upon perusing the petition and upon considering the written and oral submissions of p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top