SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 521

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AMBANK (M) BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. agreements on the binding appeals (Para 1 , 2)
2. recognition application process and submissions (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 15)
3. background events leading to the appeals. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 21)
4. allegations of bribes impacting ballot integrity (Para 13 , 14 , 18 , 19)
5. bank's challenges to minister's decisions (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
6. judicial review standards applied (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
7. standard for judicial review of administrative decisions. (Para 29)
8. limits of judicial review circumstances (Para 30 , 31)
9. limits of judicial intervention in administrative discretions. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
10. minister's discretion and decision validity (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 60)
11. minister's decision criteria on union representation was lawful. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. conditions for collective agreement initiation (Para 46 , 49 , 52 , 54)
13. minister's discretion must align with legal provisions. (Para 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 , 53)
14. recognition of the union as a precondition for collective bargaining. (Para 55 , 56 , 57)
15. failure to consider relevant matters tainted minister's decision. (Para 58 , 59)

[1] The two appeals befo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top