COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AMBANK (M) BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. agreements on the binding appeals (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. recognition application process and submissions (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 15) |
| 3. background events leading to the appeals. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. allegations of bribes impacting ballot integrity (Para 13 , 14 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. bank's challenges to minister's decisions (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. judicial review standards applied (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. standard for judicial review of administrative decisions. (Para 29) |
| 8. limits of judicial review circumstances (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. limits of judicial intervention in administrative discretions. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. minister's discretion and decision validity (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 60) |
| 11. minister's decision criteria on union representation was lawful. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 12. conditions for collective agreement initiation (Para 46 , 49 , 52 , 54) |
| 13. minister's discretion must align with legal provisions. (Para 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 , 53) |
| 14. recognition of the union as a precondition for collective bargaining. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 15. failure to consider relevant matters tainted minister's decision. (Para 58 , 59) |
[1] The two appeals befo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.