COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SOLAI REALTY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the appeal (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondent's arguments on appeal (Para 6) |
| 3. analysis of the striking out rule (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. defining 'frivolous', 'vexatious', and 'abuse of court process' (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. judicial caution in striking out applications (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
[1] The appellant in the present appeal was the plaintiff in the court below. The appeal before us is against the decision of the learned High court Judge dated 14 August 2012 in striking out the appellant's writ and statement of claim with costs under O 18 r 19 of the former Rules of the High 1980 (RHC) (now Rules of court 2012).
Appellant's Claim
[2] The appellant at the material time was a 3rd party chargor who had allowed its land vide Title No PN 10408, Lot 18, Section 20; Title No PN 10410, Lot 19 Section 20; and Title No PN 10411 Lot 20, Section 20, all at Petaling Jaya City Petaling District, Selangor to be charged to the respondent as security for several banking facilities granted by the respondent to one Percetakan Solai Sdn Bhd (borrower).
[3] The appellant's claim against the respondent is based on negl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.