SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 2625

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DATUK SERI TIONG KING SING – Appellant
Versus
DATUK SERI ONG TEE KEAT & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. defamation case background. (Para 1)

[1] This is an appeal by Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing, the appellant (the plaintiff in the High COURT) against the decision of the learned High COURT judge given on 31 July 2013 dismissing the appellant 's application ('enclosure 35') dated 15 February 2013 to compel one Joseph Sipalan to disclose the 'sources' mentioned in the article entitled 'Chua and Tiong in Cahoots' which was published on 6 September 2009 in the Sunday Times of which Joseph Sipalan was the author.

[2] For convenience, we will refer to the parties in this judgment to the title assigned to them in the COURT below.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top