SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 522

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SABAH FOREST INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL COURT MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal background and relevant facts. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. legal issue regarding compensation in lieu of reinstatement. (Para 6 , 9)
3. principles regarding reinstatement and compensation. (Para 7 , 8)
4. arguments for and against the award (Para 10)
5. legal basis for awards under the industrial relations act. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

[1] This is an appeal by Sabah Forest Industries Sdn Bhd (appellant) against part of the decision of the High Court that upheld the Industrial Court's Award of compensation in lieu of reinstatement in the sum of RM159,940.00 to Richard Felin Jinivon (2nd respondent).

[2] We heard the appeal on 24 April 2014. After hearing the parties, we adjourned the matter of our consideration and decision. We now give our decision and the reasons for the same.

Relevant Facts

[3] On 2 March 2006, the 2nd respondent was dismissed from the services of the appellant. As a result, the 2nd respondent filed a representation to the Minister under s 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ( IRA ) for reinstatement of his position.

[4] The Minister referred the appellant's representation to the Industrial Court for an Award. On 11 December 2009, the Chairman of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top