FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DYNACRAFT INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KAMARUDDIN KANA MOHD SHARIF & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the appeal. (Para 1) |
| 2. background of retrenchment and employment offers. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. industrial court's findings on retrenchment. (Para 9) |
| 4. court's previous findings and upheld rulings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. interpretation of the lifo principle. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. arguments regarding the application of lifo principle. (Para 16) |
| 7. challenges to the application of lifo principle. (Para 18 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal which dismissed the appellant's appeal against the decision of the High Court dismissing the appellant's application for an order of certiorari to quash the Industrial Court award dated 26 August 2004 ("the 2004 award"). The 2004 award was made by the Industrial Court pursuant to a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("IRA") arising out of the dismissals of Kamaruddin Kana Mohd Sharif & Ors ("the respondents") by the appellant.
Background Facts
[2] The appellant was engaged in the manufacture of semiconductor lead frames which were components used in the manufacture of semiconductor integrated circuits. I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.